JMIR mHealth and uHealth

Wearable-derived physiological features have been associated with disease risk, but most current studies focus on single conditions, limiting understanding of cross-disease patterns. This study adopts a trans-diagnostic approach to examine whether wearable data capture shared and condition-specific physiological signatures across multiple chronic conditions spanning physical and mental health, and then evaluates the utility of these features for disease classification. A total of 9,301 patients with at least 21 days of consecutive FitBit data from the All of Us Controlled Tier Dataset version 8 were analyzed. Disease subcohorts included cardiovascular disease (CVD), diabetes, obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), major depressive disorder (MDD), anxiety, bipolar disorder, and attention-deficit/ hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), chosen based on prevalence and relevance. Logistic regression and XGBoost models were fitted for each disease subcohort versus the control cohort. We found that compared to using just baseline demographic and lifestyle features, incorporating wearable-derived features enabled improved classification performance in all subcohorts for both models, except for ADHD where improvement was mainly observed for ROC-AUC in logistic regression model likely due to the smaller sample size in ADHD subcohort. The largest performance gains were observed in MDD (increase in ROC-AUC of 0.077 for Logistic regression, 0.071 for XGBoost; p < 0.001) and anxiety (increase in ROC-AUC of 0.077 for logistic regression, 0.108 for XGBoost; p < 0.001). This study provides one of the first comprehensive transdiagnostic evaluations of wearable-derived features for disease classification, highlighting their potential to enhance risk stratification in the real-world setting as a practical complement to clinical assessments and providing a foundation to explore more fine-grained wearable data. Author summaryWearable devices such as fitness trackers and smartwatches are becoming increasingly popular and affordable, providing continuous measurements of heart rate, physical activity, and sleep. Alongside the growing digitization of health records, this creates new opportunities for large-scale, real-world health studies. In this study, we analyzed wearable-derived physiological patterns across a range of chronic conditions spanning both physical and mental health to better understand how these signals relate to disease risk. We found that incorporating wearable-derived heart rate, activity and sleep features improved disease risk classification across several conditions, with particularly strong gains for major depressive disorder and anxiety. By examining how individual features contributed to model predictions, we also identified meaningful associations between physiological signals and disease risk. For example, both duration and day-to-day variation of deep and rapid eye movement (REM) sleep were associated with increased risk in certain conditions. Our study supports the development of real-time, automated tools to assess disease risk alongside clinical care.

Study ObjectivesTo evaluate wearable sleep staging across sleep apnea severity, including very severe sleep apnea defined as an apnea-hypopnea index (AHI)[&ge;] 50 events/h, and to assess how training-set composition affects performance in this subgroup. MethodsWe analyzed 552 overnight recordings, 318 from the Sleep Lab Dataset and 234 from the Hospital Dataset. In the Hospital Dataset, 26.5% had very severe sleep apnea. We developed a deep learning model for sleep staging using RR intervals from wrist-worn photoplethysmography and three-axis accelerometry. Baseline performance was assessed by cross-validation under 5-stage and 4-stage staging. We examined night-level associations with AHI severity. We also compared the baseline model with an ablation model trained on the same number of recordings but with more Sleep Lab Dataset and lower-AHI Hospital Dataset recordings, evaluating both models in the very severe subgroup. ResultsIn 5-stage classification, Cohens kappa was 0.586 in the Sleep Lab Dataset and 0.446 in the Hospital Dataset. Under 4-stage staging, the gap narrowed, with kappa values of 0.632 and 0.525, respectively. In the Hospital Dataset, performance declined with increasing AHI severity. Among 62 recordings with very severe sleep apnea, reducing high-AHI representation in training lowered kappa from 0.365 to 0.303. ConclusionsWearable sleep staging performance declined across greater sleep apnea severity in this clinical cohort. Clinical utility may benefit from training data that better represent the target severity spectrum and from selecting staging granularity to match the intended use case. Statement of SignificanceRepeated laboratory polysomnography is impractical for long-term sleep apnea management. Wearable sleep staging could support scalable monitoring, yet its reliability in clinically severe sleep apnea has remained unclear. This study developed and evaluated a wearable sleep staging approach in both sleep-laboratory and hospital cohorts. The hospital cohort included many severe and very severe cases. Performance was lower in the hospital cohort and declined with greater sleep apnea severity. A coarser staging scheme reduced the gap between cohorts, and models trained without representative very severe cases performed worse in this target population. These findings highlight the value of severity-aware model development and motivate future multi-night home validation with reliability cues.

ObjectiveLong term monitoring of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) severity may be relevant for several clinical applications. We developed a method for estimating the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) using wrist-worn, reflective photoplethysmography (PPG). ApproachA neural network was developed to detect respiratory events using PPG and PPG-derived sleep stages as input. The development database encompassed retrospective data from three polysomnographic datasets (N=3111), including a dataset with concurrent reflective PPG recordings from a wrist-worn device (N=969). The model was pre-trained with (transmissive) finger-PPG signals from all overnight recordings and then fine-tuned to wrist-PPG characteristics using transfer learning. Validation was performed on the test portion of the development set and on a fourth, external hold-out dataset containing both wrist-PPG and PSG data (N=171). Performance was evaluated in terms of AHI estimation accuracy and OSA severity classification. Main ResultsThe fine-tuned wrist-PPG model demonstrated strong agreement with the PSG-derived gold-standard AHI, achieving intra-class correlation coefficients of 0.87 in the test portion of the development set and 0.91 in the external hold-out validation set. Diagnostic performance was high, with accuracies above 80% for all severity thresholds. SignificanceThe study highlights the potential of reflective PPG-based AHI estimation, achieving high estimation performance in comparison with PSG. These measurements can be performed with relatively comfortable sensors integrated in convenient wrist-worn wearables, enabling long-term assessment of sleep disordered breathing, both in a diagnostic phase, and during therapy follow-up.

Loneliness--the perceived discrepancy between desired and actual social connection--is a common and aversive psychological state associated with a range of adverse health outcomes. Several theoretical models suggest that these associations may operate partly through health behaviors. In this preregistered study, we used data from the All of Us Research Program to evaluate associations of loneliness and functional rurality (FR), a study-specific contextual index of reduced neighborhood accessibility, with Fitbit-derived physical activity and sleep outcomes. Final samples included 16,912 participants for physical activity analyses and 13,937 for sleep analyses. In adjusted models, higher FR was associated with greater loneliness ({beta} = 0.061, 95% CI [0.045, 0.077], p = 9.63 x 10-14). FR and loneliness were independently associated with fewer daily steps and lower moderate-to-vigorous physical activity. Loneliness was also associated with shorter sleep duration, greater sleep duration variability, higher odds of short sleep, and higher odds of low sleep efficiency. FR was not associated with sleep duration or sleep duration variability but showed a small positive association with mean sleep efficiency and lower odds of low sleep efficiency. Interaction analyses provided little evidence that FR modified the associations of loneliness with most outcomes, although the FR x loneliness interaction was significant for sleep duration variability, indicating that loneliness was more strongly associated with irregular sleep duration in higher-FR contexts. Sensitivity analyses using stricter valid-day thresholds, winsorization, quartile-based exposure coding, and a backward 30-day window yielded directionally similar findings. These results suggest that FR and loneliness are independently associated with lower physical activity, whereas loneliness shows a more consistent relationship with adverse sleep patterns.

BackgroundThe mechanisms underpinning associations between sleep and psychiatric conditions are poorly understood, partly due to challenges with longitudinal sleep studies outside the laboratory. Children and young people with rare genetic conditions caused by micro-deletions or -duplications (Copy Number Variants or CNVs) have increased risk of disrupted sleep and poorer neurodevelopmental (ND) outcomes. The Sleep Detectives study aims to investigate this by tracking behavioural and neurophysiological signatures of sleep health in young people with ND risk or ND-CNVs. To optimally achieve this, we have worked with families with ND-CNVs and charity partners to co-design our tools, methods, study protocol, and materials. MethodWe established a Lived Experience Advisory Group (LEAP) with nine parents and 13 children and young people with ND-CNVs, alongside representatives of UK charities Max Appeal and Unique. Together, the research team and LEAP co-designed two in-person family workshops in which we collected feedback on the acceptability of sleep monitoring devices, the design of bespoke cognitive tasks, and overall study protocol. Informal interviews and surveys were conducted with LEAP members and researchers, to enable the team to reflect and learn from their Patient/Public Involvement (PPI) experiences. ResultsKey outputs included pre-workshop invitation and briefing materials and insights that iteratively refined the main study design, including the need for flexibility to increase accessibility, selection of sleep devices, customisation of cognitive tasks, and choice of language in documents. The PPI process was highly valued by LEAP members, workshop attendees, and the research team. One investigator described the PPI work as "reinvigorating my love of research by helping me focus on science that matters". Participating families also established peer support networks. ConclusionsInvolving families affected by ND-CNVs in co-designing the Sleep Detectives study maximised opportunities for acceptability, accessibility and scalability. The research team gained inspiration and deeper understanding of the impact of ND-CNVs on families. Families gained awareness about research, established connections with each other and peer support, and were enthusiastic about future research involvement. This experience empowered families to engage more deeply with the research process and helped the PPI work to be more impactful and inclusive. Plain English summaryChildren and young people with rare genetic conditions caused by small deletion or duplication of genetic material are more likely to experience sleep difficulties such as insomnia, restless sleep, and tiredness. They also show an increased likelihood of neurodevelopmental conditions such as learning disability and autism, and mental health issues such as anxiety. The Sleep Detectives team wanted to explore how these genetic conditions affect childrens sleep, cognition and psychiatric health. To make sure that the project design was well suited to the children and young people that would be invited to participate, the team worked closely with families to design the study. Parents and caregivers of affected children and young people were invited to join a Lived Experience Advisory Panel (LEAP), together with charity representatives and Sleep Detective researchers, to co-design two hands-on workshops, and advise on study design. Children and young people and parents/caregivers attending the workshops tried out and provided feedback on tools and devices that the research team were developing. They also advised on the arrangements and support families might need whilst taking part, and on the study protocol. This collaborative approach helped ensure the study design was optimally suited for the recruitment and participation of children and young people and their families. This report documents our public involvement work for the Sleep Detectives study, illustrating the difference the partnership between researchers and families has made to the project, and the wider benefits for all concerned.

Background: Continuous adhesive patch electrocardiographic (ECG) wearables are increasingly prescribed. Patient experience with these devices can influence adherence, but research in this area is limited. This study aimed to explore the perceptions and experiences of patients receiving wearable cardiac monitoring technology as part of their routine care through the lens of treatment burden. Methods: This was a qualitative study with semi-structured phone interviews conducted between February and May 2024. We recruited participants from primary care and outpatient clinics using maximum variation sampling to ensure diversity in sex, ethnicity, and education levels. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Results: Sixteen participants (mean age 51 years, 63% female) were interviewed (average duration: 33 minutes). Three themes were developed: 1) ?Experience using the device: Burden vs Ease of Use?, which captured participants? perceptions of how easily they could integrate the device in their daily lives; 2) ?Individual variability in responses to ECG self-monitoring? covered participants? emotional and cognitive response to knowing their heart rhythm was monitored; and 3) ?The care process shapes patient experiences? reflected support preferences during the set-up and monitoring period and the uncertainty regarding timely clinical and device feedback. Conclusions: Patients valued cardiac wearables for facilitating diagnosis and felt reassured knowing they were clinically monitored. However, gaps in information provided to patients seemed to cause anxiety for some participants. These concerns could be mitigated through clearer clinician communication and patient education at the time of prescription.

Background/Objective: Common measures of physical activity (PA) based on duration and intensity do not fully capture its complexity. Adding additional PA components of muscle strength, mechanical strain, and turning actions, can provide a more complete view of activity behavior. Furthermore, PA behaviors differ between men and women. Therefore, the goal of this study is to identify and cluster similar long-term PA patterns over time for each PA component, examined separately for men and women. Methods: We used data from 4963 participants (52% women; mean age 66 years, SD = 8.6) of the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam (1992 to 2019). PA component scores were assigned to self-reported activities, and Sequence Analysis with Optimal Matching was used to identify and cluster similar activity patterns over a period of 10 years, separately for each component and stratified by sex. Results: PA components varied by sex and displayed a unique mix of trajectories, including predominately low, medium, or high activity, increasing or decreasing patterns, and trajectories characterized by early or late mortality. Importantly, trajectories remained independent, indicating that changes in one PA component were not linked to changes in others. Conclusion: Older men and women follow distinct and independent long term PA trajectories across components, underscoring that PA behaviour cannot be described by a single dimension. Significance/Implications: The observed independence and heterogeneity of trajectories suggest that muscle strength, mechanical strain, and turning actions capture meaningful and distinct aspects of PA that are not reflected by traditional measures alone. Future PA-strategies could incorporate these dimensions and acknowledge sex-specific patterns to better reflect natural movement. The independence of components suggests that future interventions should target multiple dimensions, as changes in one component may not translate to others. Such an approach may support more tailored and sustainable PA interventions in later life.

Background. Young sexual and gender minorities of color face compound health risks shaped by interlocking systems of racism, cisgenderism, and class inequality. Spatial health research documents that place shapes health, but existing methods cannot specify the mechanisms through which spatial configurations produce different health outcomes for differently positioned people. This gap prevents targeted intervention. ObjectiveTo develop and pilot test the Spatial Intersectionality Health Framework (SIHF), which specifies three mechanisms through which space produces intersectional health inequities: Layered (multiple oppressive systems activating simultaneously), Positional (the same space producing different health pathways by intersectional position), and Conditional (nominally protective spaces carrying hidden costs for specific positions). We also introduce and validate Intersectional Geographically-Explicit Ecological Momentary Assessment (IGEMA) as the methodology operationalizing SIHF across three data levels. MethodsThe GeoSense study enrolled 32 young sexual and gender minorities of color (ages 18-29) in New York City. IGEMA was implemented across three integrated levels: (1) GPS mobility tracking via participants personal smartphones, linked to census tract structural exposure indices across n=19 participants; (2) ecological momentary assessment of intersectional discrimination with multilevel modeling of mood, stress, and sleep outcomes; and (3) map-guided qualitative interviews with SIHF mechanism coding and intercoder reliability assessment across 92 coded records from 18 participants. This study was conducted as the pilot for NIH R01HL169503. ResultsAll three SIHF mechanisms were empirically detectable. A compound structural gendered racism index outperformed every single-axis alternative in predicting daily mood (b=-0.048, p=.001) and stress (b=0.121, p<.001). The Positional mechanism accounted for 71% of coded harm experiences. Intercoder reliability for mechanism assignment reached kappa=0.824 at Stage 2 reconciliation. Daily intersectional discrimination predicted greater sleep disturbance (b=1.308, p=.004). ConclusionsSIHF and IGEMA together provide an empirically testable framework for specifying how space produces intersectional health inequities. Mechanism specification, not spatial location alone, is the condition for designing research and intervention that reaches the source of harm for multiply marginalized populations.

Introduction: Monitoring trends in transitions in the use of electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) and cigarettes among youth is important for understanding the potential public health impacts of these products. Methods: Using a weighted Markov multistate transition model accounting for complex survey design, we estimated transition rates and one-year transition probabilities between never, non-current, ENDS-only, and cigarette use (with or without dual use of ENDS) among 26,744 youth aged 12-17 years who participated in at least two consecutive waves from Waves 2-7.5 (approximately 2015-2023) of the nationally representative Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study. We also estimated transitions stratified by ages 12-14 and 15-17 years. Results. The one-year probability of ENDS-only initiation from never use among youth peaked in 2017-19 (Waves 4-5) at 4.0% (95%CI: 3.6-4.3%) and was higher for 15-17-year-olds at 5.8% (95%CI: 5.2-6.4%) than 12-14-year-olds at 2.2% (95%CI: 1.8-2.6%). In the following years, ENDS-only initiation rates declined and plateaued, with 2.6% (95%CI: 2.3-3.0%) initiation in 2022-23. Cigarette initiation from never use decreased over 2015-23 from 0.8% (95%CI: 0.6-1.0%) in 2015-16 to 0.1% (95%CI: 0.0-0.2%) in 2022-23. There was an increase in the fraction of youth who transitioned from non-current product use to ENDS-only use from 13.7% (95%CI: 7.5-20.0%) in 2015-16 to 35.1% (95%CI: 25.4-44.8%) in 2022-23, paired with a decrease in non-current use to cigarette use from 20.9% (95%CI: 11.8-30.0%) to 6.3% (95%CI: 1.7-10.8%). Transitions from ENDS-only or cigarette use to non-current use remained relatively constant over time at around 25% and 15% per year, respectively. Conclusion. ENDS-only use initiation has changed over time, peaking around 2019 and subsequently decreasing and plateauing, but cessation rates for both ENDS and cigarettes have remained relatively stable. Thus, interruption of tobacco product initiation may be the most effective approach to reducing tobacco product use among youth.

BackgroundDespite their potential to serve as a reduced-harm alternative to combustible tobacco, e-cigarette take-up remains low among older (45+) adult smokers, especially in the U.S. While social media is a known driver of vaping attitudes and behaviors in younger populations, its influence on older smokers is poorly understood. This paper provides the first focused analysis of e-cigarette-related social media exposure in this population, documenting its prevalence, characteristics, and attitudinal correlates. MethodsData come from an opt-in survey of U.S. adults (N = 974) recruited via Prolific, comprising three groups: (i) non-vaping smokers aged 45+ (N = 484), (ii) former-smoking vapers aged 45+ (N = 149), and (iii) any-vaping-status smokers aged 18-35 (N = 341). Descriptive statistics, weighted to U.S. population benchmarks, characterize self-reported exposure to e-cigarette-related content on social media. Logistic regressions estimate associations between exposure and intentions for future e-cigarette use, e-cigarette harm perceptions, and related attitudes. ResultsOlder smokers (35.3%) reported exposure to e-cigarette-related content on social media less frequently than both older vapers (44.0%) and younger smokers (72.0%). For older smokers, e-cigarette health risks were the most frequently reported topic of content viewed, followed by youth vaping and e-cigarette addiction. Among this group, exposure was positively associated with stated intentions for future e-cigarette use. Exposure was not significantly associated with perceived e-cigarette harms for any group. ConclusionsFindings provide suggestive evidence that social media exposure may promote e-cigarette adoption among older smokers. However, the cross-sectional design limits causal inference, and the observed associations may reflect selection bias or reverse causality. If a causal relationship exists, the patterns observed suggest that exposure influences e-cigarette adoption through mechanisms other than updating beliefs about e-cigarette risks. While these results tentatively support the potential of social media as a channel for older-smoker harm reduction, any policy applications must carefully weigh privacy concerns and risks to youth. Rigorous experimental studies are needed to confirm these findings and clarify how social media might be leveraged to improve public health outcomes among older smokers.

BackgroundThe rapid proliferation of digital platforms has transformed health information access but has also led to increased exposure to misinformation. Existing research lacks standardized tools to quantify individual-level exposure to health misinformation in a comprehensive manner. ObjectiveTo develop a novel composite index--the Misinformation Exposure Index (MEI)--to measure multidimensional exposure to health misinformation among social media users. MethodsA questionnaire-based pilot study was conducted among a young adult population to assess patterns of health information exposure, source utilization, trust, and behavioural responses. The MEI was developed using a multi-domain framework comprising Exposure Frequency, Source Diversity and Risk, Trust in Information, and Behavioural Response. Responses were scored using Likert scales and weighted domain contributions to generate a composite score ranging from 0 to 100. ResultsParticipants demonstrated moderate to high engagement with digital platforms for health information, with reliance on both formal and informal sources. Variability in trust and verification behaviours was observed, with a proportion of participants reporting adoption of health-related practices without professional consultation. Composite MEI scores indicated that most individuals fell within the moderate exposure category, with a subset exhibiting high exposure characterized by frequent engagement with high-risk sources and behavioural influence. ConclusionThe MEI provides a novel and comprehensive framework for quantifying health misinformation exposure by integrating exposure patterns, source characteristics, trust, and behavioural outcomes. The index has potential applications in public health surveillance and intervention design. Further validation through large-scale studies is warranted to establish its reliability and generalizability.

Background: The urgent care departments in Europe face a structural paradox: accelerating digitalisation is accompanied by a patient population that is disproportionately unable to engage with standard digital tools. An internal analysis at the Emergency Department (Akutafdelingen) of Nordsjaellands Hospital in Hilleroed, Denmark found that 43% of emergency patients struggle with digital solutions - a figure that reflects the predictable composition of acute care populations rather than any individual failing. Objective: This paper presents the design, iterative development, and secondary validation of the ED Adaptive Interface (v5): a prototype adaptive patient terminal developed in response to this challenge. The system operationalises what the author terms impairment-first design - a methodology that treats the most constrained patient experience as the primary design problem and derives the standard experience as a subset. The interface configures itself in under ten seconds via nurse-led setup, adapting across four axes of impairment: visual, motor, speech, and cognitive. System: Version 4 supports five accessibility modes, a heatmap pain assessment grid, a Privacy and Dignity panel, a live workflow tracker with care notifications, structured dual-category help requests, and plain-language medical term definitions across four languages. Version 5, reported here for the first time, introduces a Condition Worsening Escalation button, a Referral Pathway Display, a "Why Am I Waiting?" triage explainer, a Symptom Progression Log, MinSP/Yellow Card Scan simulation, expanded language support (seven languages: English, Danish, Arabic with full RTL layout, Turkish, Romanian, Polish, and Somali), and an expanded ten-item Communication Board. The entire system runs as a single 79-kilobyte HTML file with zero infrastructure requirements. Methods: To base the design on patient-generated evidence, two independent social media threads were subjected to an inductive thematic analysis (Braun and Clarke, 2006): a primary corpus of 83 entries in the Facebook group Foreigners in Denmark (collected March 2026) and a corroborating corpus in an international community group in the Aarhus region (collected April 2026). All identifiers in both datasets were fully anonymised under GDPR Article 89 research provisions prior to analysis. No participants were contacted. Generative AI tools were used to assist with drafting, writing, and prototype code development; all scientific content, data collection, analysis, and conclusions are the sole responsibility of the authors. Results: The first discourse corpus produced five major themes corresponding to the five problem areas the prototype was designed to address: system navigation and triage literacy gaps (31 entries); language and cultural barriers (6 entries); communication failures during care (5 entries); staff overload and capacity constraints (8 entries); and pain and severity assessment failures (14 entries). The corroborating dataset supported all five themes and introduced two additional themes: differential treatment of international patients and medical gaslighting as a long-term pattern of patient advocacy failure. One structural finding - the five most-liked comments incorrectly criticised the original poster for self-referring when she had received explicit 1813 telephone triage approval - directly inspired the Referral Pathway Display and "Why Am I Waiting?" features in v5. Conclusions: The convergence of design rationale and independent social evidence across all five problem categories suggests that impairment-first design is not a niche accessibility concern but a structural approach to healthcare interface quality. The prototype is ready for a structured clinical pilot using the System Usability Scale (SUS) and semi-structured staff interviews. The long-term roadmap includes full MinSP integration, hospital PMS connectivity, and clinical validation.

Background Comprehensive sexuality education (CSE) is essential to the health and well-being of young people. In the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), where more than 65% of the population is under the age of 25, access to interpersonal CSE remains limited owing to sociocultural and structural barriers. This exposes young people to persistent socio-sanitary vulnerabilities. In this context, mobile health apps (MHAs) constitute a promising solution, supported by the growing use of smartphones among young Congolese. However, this group's intention to use MHAs for CSE has been the subject of little research to date. Objective The aim of this study was to identify predictors of intention to use MHAs among young Congolese, based on the extended Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT2). Methods A predictive correlational study was conducted in eight public secondary schools in Bukavu (DRC) with a stratified random sample of 859 students. Predictors of intention to use--performance expectancy (PE), effort expectancy (EE), social influence (SI), facilitating conditions (FC), and perceived risk (PR)--and moderators--age, gender, and past MHA experience--were measured from data collected through a self-administered UTAUT questionnaire. Descriptive and multivariate analyses were run on SPSS version 28. Results Mean age of participants was 16.3 years (SD = 1.5). Boys made up 55.1% of the sample. Overall, 51.0% of the sample owned a smartphone, of which 62.3% reported having easy access to mobile data and 16.2% were already using MHAs to learn about sexual health. Intention to use MHAs was positively influenced by PE ({beta} = 0.523, p < 0.001), EE ({beta} = 0.115, p < 0.001), and SI ({beta} = 0.113, p < 0.001). FC (p = 0.260) and PR (p = 0.631), however, had no significant influence. Age moderated all of the relationships tested (F (1, 849-854) = 9.97-20.82; p [&le;] 0.002), with more marked effects observed among younger participants 14-15 years old. The final model explained 44% of the variance, indicating good predictive power. Conclusion Intention to use digital CSE was explained primarily by PE, EE, and SI and moderated by age. To strengthen this intention, stakeholders will need to promote e-interventions that are pertinent, easy to use, socially valorized, and tailored to young people's needs and to the local context.

Background: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used in mental health contexts, yet their detection of suicidal ideation is inconsistent, raising patient safety concerns. Objective: To evaluate whether an independent safety monitoring system improves detection of suicide risk compared with native LLM safeguards. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional evaluation using 224 paired suicide-related clinical vignettes presented in a single-turn format under two conditions (with and without structured clinical information). Native LLM safeguard responses were compared with an independent supervisory safety architecture with asynchronous monitoring. The primary outcome was detection of suicide risk requiring intervention. Results: The supervisory system detected suicide risk in 205 of 224 evaluations (91.5%) versus 41 of 224 (18.3%) for native LLM safeguards. Among 168 discordant evaluations, 166 favored the supervisory system and 2 favored the LLM (matched odds ratio {approx}83.0). Both systems detected risk in 39 evaluations, and neither in 17. Detection was highest in scenarios with explicit suicidal ideation and lower in more ambiguous presentations. Conclusions: Native LLM safeguards frequently failed to detect suicide risk in this structured evaluation. An independent monitoring approach substantially improved detection, supporting the role of external safety systems in high-risk mental health applications of LLMs.

ObjectivesTo develop and evaluate predictive models for unused outpatient appointments (missed or cancelled) using a large national electronic health record (EHR) repository in the United States. DesignRetrospective observational study using machine learning and statistical modeling. SettingA U.S. national electronic health record repository (Cerner Real World Database) covering healthcare encounters from 2010 to 2025. ParticipantsAdult patients aged [&ge;]18 years with routine outpatient encounters recorded in the database. One outpatient appointment with a known status was randomly selected per patient, resulting in a final analytic sample of 5,699,861 encounters. Primary and Secondary Outcome MeasuresThe primary outcome was whether the index outpatient appointment was attended or unused (missed or cancelled). Model performance was evaluated using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity. MethodsPredictors included patient characteristics (demographics and insurance type), appointment characteristics (day, time, season, and urbanicity), prior cancellation rate, and time gap between the index appointment and the previous visit. We compared the predictive performance of two machine learning models (random forest classifier and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost)) with logistic regression. An explainable AI analysis of feature impact was performed on the final XGBoost model. ResultsAmong 5,699,861 outpatient encounters, 3,650,715 (64.0%) were attended and 2,049,146 (36.0%) were unused. XGBoost achieved the best predictive performance on the test dataset (AUC = 0.95), followed by random forest (AUC = 0.92) and logistic regression (AUC = 0.89). Feature impact score analysis revealed highly non-linear associations between predictors and the risk of unused appointments at the individual level. ConclusionsUnused outpatient appointments can be accurately predicted using routinely available EHR data. Integrating predictive models into scheduling workflows may improve healthcare efficiency and optimize appointment management. Article SummaryStrengths and limitations of this study O_LIThis study used one of the largest national electronic health record datasets to develop predictive models for unused outpatient appointments. C_LIO_LIMultiple modeling approaches, including logistic regression and machine learning methods (random forest and XGBoost), were compared to evaluate predictive performance. C_LIO_LIAn explainable artificial intelligence method was applied to quantify feature impact and improve model interpretability. C_LIO_LIThe retrospective design and reliance on routinely collected EHR data may introduce data quality limitations and unmeasured confounding. C_LIO_LIThe database did not distinguish clearly between cancelled appointments and no-shows. C_LI

Objectives: Longer lifespans lead to longer time on retirement, despite the efforts to raise the retirement age. Therefore, it is important to study how the retirement years can be spent without diseases. This study examined socioeconomic and sociodemographic differences in healthy years spent on retirement. Methods: We followed a cohort of retired Finnish municipal employees (N=4231, average follow-up 15.4 years) on national administrative registers for major chronic diseases: cancer, coronary heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, diabetes, asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, dementia, mental disorders, and alcohol-related disorders. Median healthy years on retirement and age at first occurrence of illness (ICD-10 and ATC-based) in each combination of sex, occupational class, and age of retirement were predicted using Royston-Parmar models. Prevalence rates for each diagnostic group were calculated. Results: Most healthy years on retirement were spent by women having worked in semi-professional jobs who retired at age 60-62 (median predicted healthy years 11.6, 95% CI 10.4-12.7). The least healthy years on retirement were spent by men having worked in routine non-manual jobs who retired after age 62 (median predicted healthy years 6.5, 95% CI 4.4-9.5). Diabetes was slightly more common among lower occupational class women, and dementia among manual working women having retired at age 60-62. Discussion: Healthy years on retirement are not enjoyed equally by women and men and those who retire early or later. Policies aiming to increase the retirement age should consider the effects of these gaps on retirees and the equitability of those effects.

BackgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic significantly accelerated the adoption of telemedicine, but it also exposed gaps in effective remote clinical assessment, particularly for medically vulnerable patients in rural areas. The ORCHARD intervention aimed to address this by providing patients with a Medical Self-Assessment Box to enable self-reporting of vital signs during remote consultations. MethodsA single-centre randomised mixed-methods feasibility trial recruited medically vulnerable patients from a rural general practice in Northeast Scotland. Participants in intervention group received a home medical equipment box for use during telemedicine consultations over six months. Patients and GPs were interviewed and transcripts were analysed using Framework Analysis. ResultsTwelve (15%) of 82 eligible invited patients enrolled. Six each were allocated to intervention and control group. 50%(n=3)patients in intervention group used equipment in 45%(5 of 11)teleconsultations and rated it helpful in all 5 uses (100%). The intervention group had 18% fewer primary care contacts than controls. All remote consultations were by telephone. Framework Analysis of patient interviews identified facilitators such as ease of use, improved triage access, reassurance, and barriers related to GP non-engagement and written instructions. GP interviews identified clinical value in patient-generated readings, alongside concerns regarding workload and patient over-monitoring. ConclusionsHalf of intervention participants used the medical-equipment box during remote consultations, all finding it useful, though frequency of use varied among particpants.A randomised controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of the Medical Self-Assessment Box for optimising remote consulting in medically vulnerable rural patients is feasible.Prior to a definitive trial refinements are recommended to patient labelling, GP engagement, and training materials.

Abstract Background Musculoskeletal conditions, such as back pain and osteoarthritis, are common and disabling disorders. Musculoskeletal conditions are closely related to chronic disease risk factors like smoking/vaping, poor nutrition, alcohol misuse and physical inactivity and impact a person's risk of falling (SNAPF). Preventive care for SNAPF risks is often overlooked. Online delivery of preventive care may increase the provision of this care. We aimed to assess if an online tool for SNAPF risks would be used by and acceptable to patients waiting for an orthopaedic consultation. Methods We completed a multi-method study to test an online health risk self-assessment tool. A random sample of 300 people on the orthopaedic outpatient waiting list aged 18-64 years were sent the tool in batches of 20-50. The tool assessed SNAPF risks and provided feedback against national guidelines. After each batch, we completed feedback interviews with participants to assess acceptability and updated the tool. We summarised quantitative data using descriptive statistics and qualitative data using thematic analysis. Results Of the 300 participants sent the tool, 51.3% were female, 8.6% identified as Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander, with a mean (SD) age of 52.0 years (11.2). There were 170 participants (59.2%) who completed the tool, 117 who did not complete it, and 13 participants who were excluded from analysis because they did not receive the SMS. We conducted 184 feedback interviews, including 125 'completers' and 59 'non-completers'. The percentage of participants who felt that SMS was an appropriate way to receive the tool was 84.7% of 'completers' and 50% of 'non-completers'. The two most common reasons for not completing the tool were due to perceived risk (13/59, 22.0%), and the SMS was received at an inconvenient time (11/59, 18.6%). Qualitative data from the feedback interviews captured three enablers: i) design, ii) high importance, and iii) engagement with health service, along with four barriers: i) design, ii) risk, iii) relevance, and iv) engagement with health service. Conclusion Our study found that an online health risk self-assessment tool appears to be an acceptable way to assess chronic disease and falls risk factors for people on an orthopaedic waitlist.

Background: Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) chatbots have shown utility in assisting with various research tasks. Traditional, complementary, and integrative medicine (TCIM) is a patient-centric approach that emphasizes holistic well-being. The integration of TCIM and GenAI presents numerous key opportunities. However, TCIM researchers' attitudes toward GenAI tools remain less understood. This large-scale, international cross-sectional survey aimed to elucidate the attitudes and perceptions of TCIM researchers regarding the use of GenAI chatbots in the scientific process. Methods: A search strategy in Ovid MEDLINE identified corresponding authors who were TCIM researchers. Eligible authors were invited to complete an anonymous online survey administered via SurveyMonkey. The survey included questions on socio-demographic characteristics, familiarity with GenAI chatbots, and perceived benefits and challenges of using GenAI chatbots. Results were analysed using descriptive statistics and thematic content analysis. Results: The survey received 716 responses. Most respondents reported familiarity with GenAI chatbots (58.08%) and viewed them as very important to the future of scientific research (54.37%). The most acknowledged benefits included workload reduction (74.07%) and increased efficiency in data analysis/experimentation (71.14%). The most frequently reported challenges involved bias, errors, and limitations. More than half of the respondents (57.02%) expressed a need for training to use GenAI chatbots in the scientific process, alongside an interest in receiving training (72.07%). However, 43.67% indicated that their institutions did not offer these programs. Discussion: By developing a deeper understanding of TCIM researchers' perspectives, future AI applications in this field can be more informed, and guide future policies and collaboration among researchers.

Aims Indoor air pollution resulting from combustion of unclean cooking fuels has been linked to adverse health outcomes, but evidence regarding its association with mental health in low- and middle-income countries remains limited. We investigated the association between household use of unclean cooking fuels, as a proxy for indoor air pollution, and depression symptoms among adults aged 45 years and older in India, and assessed effect modification by age, sex, caste, and rural/urban residence. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of the first wave (2017-2018) of data from the Longitudinal Aging Study in India (LASI), a nationally representative survey of adults aged [&ge;]45 years. Cooking fuel type was classified as clean or unclean, and depression symptoms were assessed using the 10-item Centre for Epidemiologic Studies Depression (CES-D-10) scale. We used logistic regression to estimate odds ratios for depression symptoms, and linear regression to compare mean CES-D-10 scores by cooking fuel type, adjusting for sociodemographic and housing characteristics. Results We included 62,650 respondents. Median age was 57 years (IQR: 50-65), 46.7% were women, 47.6% reported using unclean cooking fuels, and 27.6% screened positive on the CES-D-10. After adjusting for sociodemographic and housing characteristics, use of unclean cooking fuels was associated with higher odds of screening positive on the CES-D-10 (aOR: 1.08; 95% CI: 1.02, 1.15), and higher mean CES-D-10 scores (adjusted mean difference: 0.34; 95% CI: 0.24, 0.44). The association was more pronounced among individuals living in urban areas (aOR: 1.36; 95% CI: 1.21, 1.53). Conclusion Use of unclean cooking fuels was associated with depression symptoms among older adults in India, and especially among those living in urban areas.