JMIR mHealth and uHealth

Background: Shiftwork disrupts natural sleep-wake cycles, alters light exposure patterns, and contributes to circadian misalignment. Detrimental health consequences associated with shift work include elevated risk for metabolic disorders, cardiovascular disease, cancer and all-cause mortality. Healthcare workers have one of the highest rates of shift work exposure, yet there are relatively few non-pharmacological interventions (with good evidence) developed to improve sleep outcomes in this population. Objective: A pre-post pilot interventional study assessed the acceptability and perceived effectiveness of commercial noise-masking earbuds on improving subjective sleep characteristics among National Health Service (NHS) healthcare staff working fast rotating shifts. Methods: Noise-masking sleep earbuds (Kokoon NightBuds) were worn for a pilot six-week intervention by twenty-seven NHS nurses (aged 26-43 years, 88.9% female) working fast rotating shifts from the EClocker Study. Sensors inside the earbuds were paired with a smartphone app to monitor sleep. An audio library in the smartphone app delivered personalised relaxation exercises and sleep techniques drawn from cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia (CBT-I). A pre-post two-week monitoring period with daily smartphone-based Experience Sampling Methods (ESM) captured perceived daily sleep patterns. Acceptability and perceived effectiveness of the earbuds in promoting better sleep outcomes was assessed. Results: Use of the noise-masking sleep earbuds over a six-week period was associated with positive sleep improvement trends and elicited promising acceptability. Almost two thirds of NHS fast rotating shift nurses (63%) subjectively reported reductions in general sleep disturbance symptoms (PSQI Global), one in four experienced perceived sleep quality improvements (SQ; 25.9%), one in five reported sleeping longer (TST; 22.2%), and a third perceived falling asleep faster (SOL; 33.3%), had better sleep efficiency (SE; 33.3%) and improved daytime dysfunction (33.3%) (PSQI subcomponent scores). Sleep diaries (CSD) collected daily using smartphone-based ESM also demonstrated small improvements post-sleep earbud use; nurses reported sleeping an average 18 minutes longer (TST) and fell asleep more easily, on average 11 minutes faster (SOL). Sleep earbuds were generally well tolerated; 56% of nurses reported the earbuds as (somewhat to very) helpful, 52% reported (somewhat to strongly) falling asleep more easily (SOL), 44% felt (somewhat to strongly) their sleep quality was improved (SQ) and 30% agreed (somewhat to strongly) they slept longer (TST) and had less disturbed sleep. Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the first study in Europe to pilot noise-masking earbuds as a potential non-pharmacological aid to improve sleep-wake behaviours or mitigate fatigue for healthcare staff. Preliminary results showed promising acceptability and (small) perceived sleep improvement trends following a targeted six-week earbud intervention in NHS fast rotating shift nurses.

Wearable (accelerometer) data and machine-learning allow objective assessment of the amount of daily physical activity. However, wearable-derived human activity is subject to measurement error. No studies have corrected the dose-response association between physical activity and survival time to chronic diseases, including cardiovascular disease (CVD). The objective is to estimate the measurement error-corrected association between CVD events and multiple measures of daily duration of light and total physical activity, derived from machine-learning and conventional accelerometer-processing methods. Our method combined an accelerated failure time model, spline, and simulation-extrapolation (SIMEX). The method recovered the true dose-response non-linear association in simulated data, while the naive model failed to capture it due to substantial attenuation. Application to the UK Biobank accelerometer cohort also showed an increased protective association of total physical activity after SIMEX correction (Time Ratio [TR] = 1.56, 95% CI: 1.28-1.82 vs. TR = 1.38, 95% CI: 1.24-1.54 for SIMEX-corrected vs. uncorrected dose-response association between the 95th and 5th percentiles of total activity), with a similar increase for light physical activity. Sensitivity analysis indicates that the female population experiences a substantially larger protective association after SIMEX correction than males. Dose-response survival analysis is a widely used analytical method in physical activity epidemiology and benefits from measurement error correction.

Background Sleep, mood, and affective states are mutually connected. There is a paucity of studies, however, that have considered bidirectional relationships between daily sleep-affective dyads in naturalistic settings, particularly for shift workers. Objective To evaluate the dynamic and temporal interplay of daily smartphone-based self-reported sleep measurements, dimensions of affective experience and cognitive processing in UK shift working nurses. Methods The EClocker Study prospectively monitored 102 National Health Service (NHS) nurses (aged 25-61 years, 83.3% female) working standard (day shift) and non-standard (fast rotating shifts) schedules over a two-week period. Smartphone-based Experience Sampling Methodology (ESM) recorded daily sleep, mood, momentary affect and cognitive attentional functioning. Self-reported burnout, emotional dysregulation, emotion reactivity and affective dimensions (positive and negative) were also collected. Findings Overall, NHS nurses reported a high prevalence of depressive symptoms, stress, burnout and sleep-circadian rhythm disturbances. Generalised Additive Modelling (GAMs) revealed that NHS nurses higher perceived sleep quality predicted better next-day mood state, while better daytime mood was associated with reduced sleep onset latency, such that participants reported falling asleep faster. In contrast, daytime mood or affect (positive and negative) had no substantial, direct impact on nurses subjective sleep parameters (sleep quality, sleep duration, sleep efficiency). Exposure to fast rotating night shifts across the two-week study was associated with more frequent response errors on a Choice Reaction Time (CRT) cognitive task, while daytime somnolence did not adversely influence nurses momentary reaction time speeds or attentional function. Conclusions Clinically relevant sleep impairments, insomnia-related symptoms, elevated stress, and poor mood were pervasive in a sample of UK NHS nurses, regardless of shift type. Sleep quality impacted next-day mood and daytime mood impacted sleep latency, while rotating shifts led to an increase in cognitive errors. Recognising the impact of shiftwork and designing interventions to promote better sleep quality offer potential to enhance mood and performance in healthcare professionals. Clinical implications We need to implement and evaluate interventions that regularise sleep patterns and promote sleep quality to alleviate mood symptoms among frontline NHS shift workers.

Introduction: Risk of recurrent opioid use during buprenorphine-naloxone (bup-nx) treatment is dynamic and remains elevated after initiation, with vulnerability shaped in part by treatment intensity and gaps between visits, yet routine outpatient care relies on episodic encounters and retrospective data. This mismatch can delay recognition of emerging instability and limit timely treatment adjustments. This paper reports the development and specification of an intervention strategy to address this mismatch. Methods: We used a structured, multi-phase design process to specify and configure a measurement-based care (MBC) strategy for bup-nx treatment (Bup-MBC) in outpatient addiction clinics through three phases: (1) a systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for substance use treatment; (2) a qualitative needs assessment using the Theoretical Domains Framework and COM-B (Capability, Opportunity, Motivation-Behavior) model to identify gaps in risk monitoring, agency, and trust; and (3) iterative co-design with multidisciplinary clinicians to refine workflow fit and trust-preserving use of data. Patients informed item and feedback content during the needs assessment but did not participate in the co-design cycles. Results: Bup-MBC integrates (1) brief between-visit PROMs (e.g., withdrawal, craving, adherence); (2) immediate non-punitive patient feedback; (3) clinician-facing summaries and non-directive prompts in the electronic health record (EHR); and (4) an opt-in between-visit outreach pathway with predefined safety triggers, all configured within existing EHR and patient portal infrastructure. It targets patient and clinician capability to recognize changes in risk, opportunity for action through structured monitoring and visit preparation, and trust and agency through non-punitive communication, without adding substantial burden. The full measure set, severity bands, and question-to-action map are provided as supplementary material. Key trade-offs included prioritizing single-item measures for feasibility, balancing opt-in outreach with safety overrides, and assuming routine clinician use of summaries. Conclusion: This development study specifies an EHR-integrated MBC strategy for outpatient bup-nx treatment. As single-center design work with co-design limited to clinicians and delivery contingent on portal or text-message access, its outputs are hypotheses about mechanism and fit rather than demonstrated effects. Feasibility studies are needed to evaluate uptake, acceptability, workflow fit, and effects on treatment.

Motivation: With the scaling frequency and intensity of extreme heat events across the globe, it is critical for public institutions to develop early detection systems and continuous monitoring of these events and their impacts. In Brazil, Rio de Janeiro was the first city to publish its heat protocol, with the Rio Heat Dashboard as a central component of this system. Implementation: The dashboard was implemented using R/Shiny and integrates climatic and health data from multiple sources. General features: The application comprises real-time heat exposure monitoring and automatic alert level classification, which is monitored daily by multiple municipal actors and supports activation of actions specified in the heat protocol. It also features a health impact module, which lists each heat event and its impact on mortality, and primary care and emergency visits. Availability: The source for full reproducibility is available through https://github.com/joaohmorais/RioHeatDashboard.

This study aimed to quantify the longitudinal tracking and cross-sectional construct validity of a single-item questionnaire measuring recreational physical activity frequency (RPAF) in the Womens Healthy Ageing Project. At baseline, 474 participants aged 45-55 reported RPAF from 1993 to 2014. Longitudinal tracking of the RPAF item was assessed as a consecutive-wave and baseline-referenced measure using linear weighted kappa (LWK), Spearman correlations, exact agreement and within-one-category agreement. Construct validity in the form of convergent and known-group validity was assessed using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) leisure activity domains, Short Form 36 physical function (SF-36-PF) subscale, Timed Up and Go (TUG), hand grip strength (HGS) and waist-to-height ratio (WHtR). 474 participants provided baseline RPAF data. Pairwise longitudinal samples ranged from 176 to 459 across the study. Consecutive-wave LWK ranged from 0.38 to 0.49, and Spearman correlations ranged from 0.44 to 0.57. Exact and within-category agreement ranged from 41.4%-50.8% and 72.0%-79.0%. Baseline-referenced LWK ranged from 0.22 to 0.47, with Spearman correlations of 0.29 to 0.56. RPAF correlated with total IPAQ leisure score (rs = 0.60), IPAQ walking score (rs = 0.58), SF-36-PF (rs = 0.33) and TUG score (rs = -0.25). No significant correlation was identified between RPAF, HGS or WhTR. RPAF discriminated known groups for WHO guideline-sufficient activity, SF-36-PF, and TUG fall risk. The RPAF item demonstrated fair-to-moderate agreement in consecutive waves, with weaker baseline-referenced tracking. Cross-sectional validity was highest with total IPAQ leisure activity. The item may provide a pragmatic measure for RPAF in womens cohort studies.

The availability of hearing aids that can connect wirelessly to smartphone technologies via Bluetooth has grown exponentially in recent years. However, there is limited evidence assessing the benefits of user-adjustability afforded by these devices. This study aimed to assess the benefits of smartphone-connected hearing aids and an accompanying application (or app) in new and existing hearing aid users. In this single-centre, prospective, observational study, 44 adult hearing aid users (14 new and 30 existing) were recruited. Participants were fitted bilaterally with smartphone-connected hearing aids that could be adjusted by the user via an app. Self-reported outcome measures were collected at fitting and after seven-weeks of using the device in everyday life. For both new and existing hearing aid users, significant improvements in social participation, hearing-related fatigue, and hearing aid benefit and satisfaction were found. For existing hearing aid users, all outcomes were significantly better for the smartphone-connected hearing aids plus app in comparison to their existing hearing aids that did not connect to a smartphone, all with moderate-to-large clinical effect sizes (d> .6). User-controllability via the app was identified as the key benefit, and most participants (68%) reported that the app met their needs 'extremely' or 'very well'. These results suggest that, when used in conjunction with an app, smartphone-connected hearing aids can improve hearing outcomes due to greater user-controllability to improve listening. Thus, smartphone-connected hearing aids have the potential to facilitate patient-centred care, empowering the individual to successfully manage their hearing loss.

Agentic workflows can coordinate modelling, but balancing predictive performance, measurement burden and reproducibility is unclear. We developed DXA Agent, an agentic workflow for dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) outcomes integrating planning, feature-model refinement, tools, provenance and hypothesis-generating interpretation. Models were independently developed and tested in UK Biobank (5,318 participants) and the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES; 3,777 participants), using cost-efficient and no-limit strategies. Across 20 UK Biobank and three NHANES bone mineral density sites, cost-efficient models achieved lower RMSE and higher R2 than the best conventional comparator, with median relative RMSE reductions of 10.9% and 9.9%, respectively. Classification was task dependent: UK Biobank osteoporosis averaged AUROC 0.839 and PR-AUC 0.182, whereas NHANES performance was comparable with conventional models. Higher-burden features did not consistently improve prediction. These retrospective, cohort-internal findings position DXA Agent as an inspectable, measurement-burden-aware research workflow requiring independent prospective validation.

Importance: Patients are increasingly learning Alzheimers disease (AD) genetic and biomarker results through electronic health portals. Evaluation of alternative scalable delivery models for return of AD risk information is needed to best support patient understanding and psychological well-being. Objective: To determine whether a patient-centered digital platform is comparable to clinician-mediated telehealth sessions for returning APOE and plasma pTau-217 results on outcomes of knowledge and psychological well-being. Design: The Evaluation of Self-Mediated Alternatives for Risk Testing Education and Return of Results (eSMARTER) study was a noninferiority trial of a patient-centered digital platform compared to clinician-mediated disclosure of APOE genotype and optional pTau-217 disclosure. Setting: Decentralized, fully remote trial enrolled participants in the contiguous United States (U.S.) between October 2024 and February 2025, with follow-up completed in November 2025. Participants: Eligible participants were aged 60-80 and had previously undergone APOE genotyping (without disclosure) via the GeneMatch program, passed psychological screening, had internet access, and were English-speaking. Interventions: Participants were randomized, 2:1, to the eSMARTER digital platform or clinician-mediated disclosure of APOE genotype. Following the 6-month post-APOE assessment, participants were offered optional pTau-217 disclosure via the same randomized modality. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcomes at 1-7 days following APOE disclosure included changes in anxiety, disease-specific distress, and AD-related knowledge within a priori non-inferiority margins. Results: 674 persons (mean [SD] age 68 [4.7] years; 451 [67%] female; mean [SD] telephone MoCA=19 [2]) were eligible and provided demographic information. 651 participants were randomized to clinician-mediated (n=216) or digital disclosure (n=435) and completed APOE disclosure (66 [10%] APOE4 homozygotes, 377 [58%] heterozygotes, 208 [32%] non-carriers). 604 participants completed the study; 500 completed optional pTau-217 disclosure. Baseline characteristics were balanced across groups. At 1-7 days following APOE disclosure, scores on AD-related knowledge, PROMIS Anxiety, and disease-specific distress measures met non-inferiority. Conclusions and Relevance: Disclosure of APOE genotype by the eSMARTER digital platform is non-inferior to clinician-mediated telehealth disclosure. No significant between group differences were found following disclosure of pTau-217 results. Together, these results suggest that this digital platform may provide an evidence-based scalable approach for returning AD genetic and biomarker results.

Digital phenotyping, which is defined as quantifying someone's behaviour with digital devices, provides unprecedented opportunities for understanding human mental health but is hampered by high levels of inter-individual variability. Here, we propose a new method to address this, parsing inter-individual variability by decomposing the digital phenotype dynamics into latent trajectories and using each individual's trajectory membership as a moderator when modelling psychopathology over the same timeframe. We applied our method in the context of mood symptom exacerbation across the menstrual cycle, where symptom severity and timing are inconsistent between individuals. Using the BiAffect platform to collect smartphone typing dynamics, we found stable trajectories in smartphone movement rate: one group of participants showed substantial movement rate fluctuations across the menstrual cycle, whilst the others did not. Participants with movement fluctuations displayed increased fluctuations across the cycle in prospective anhedonia and depression ratings, but not in anxiety, irritability, and suicidal ideation.

Importance: Evidence on GLP-1/GIP therapies is largely derived from trials enrolling selected populations or medical records that miss utilization outside healthcare channels. No nationally representative cohort has characterized real-world uptake, indications, and access. Objective: To characterize GLP-1/GIP prevalence, indication, clinical profile, and access. Design: Prospective cohort study with three GLP-1/GIP surveillance waves (March 2024, December 2024, October 2025). Setting: The Understanding America Study, an address-based, nationally representative panel of approximately 15,000 US adults aged 18+ years initiated in 2014. Participants: UAS participants responding to at least one surveillance wave (n=9150). Exposures: GLP-1/GIP use status (never vs any use, comprising current and former use), self-reported primary indication (diabetes, weight loss, or other), and access pathway (traditional vs non-traditional). Main Outcomes and Measures: Survey-weighted prevalence of GLP-1/GIP use, overall and by indication and access pathway; sociodemographic, cardiometabolic, treatment, and access characteristics; and smartwatch-derived resting heart rate, heart rate variability, maximum activity heart rate, step count, and sleep duration and variability. Results: Among n=9150 adults (1274 with any use; 60.9% female; median age 53 years), weighted prevalence increased 46%, from 8.2% (March 2024) to 12.0% (October 2025) representing 32 million. Weight-loss indications grew, reaching nearly half of use (4.1% to 5.6%); diabetes-indicated use was stable (5.3% to 5.4%). Users carried high cardiometabolic burden (obesity, 68.2%; diabetes, 53.6%) but diverged by indication: diabetes-indicated users were older (median, 59 vs 49 years), whereas weight-loss-indicated users were more often female (69.9% vs 51.3%) and healthier. One in three users (~9 million) had non-traditional access, especially in weight-loss-indicated users, of whom 33% had no conventional prescription; 41% used compounding, online, or foreign pharmacies; and, 43% lacked coverage. Non-traditional users were five times as likely to report an unlisted, likely compounded formulation (19.8% vs 4.1%). All p<0.05. Conclusions and Relevance: Real-world GLP-1/GIP use has grown rapidly and diversified substantially in indication, access, and population profile. One in 3 users obtained treatment through nontraditional channels largely invisible to claims data, raising long-term safety, efficacy, and coverage questions. GLIMMER provides a public, nationally representative longitudinal evidence base for future payer and provider decisions.

Large language models perform well on medical examinations, but users routinely challenge their answers and invoke professional roles, and it is unclear what a system does when a medical credential and a stated task-specific accuracy point in opposite directions. In a factorial experiment on 480 items from four Polish specialty examination sets and three consumer large language model systems (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini), each item and system received eleven independent conversations. Conditions crossed attributed source role (medical student, experienced specialist), stated prior accuracy on similar questions (2/10, 8/10) and suggestion correctness. The primary outcome was adoption of a prespecified incorrect option when the baseline answer matched the official key, comparing a specialist described as 2/10 with a student described as 8/10. Baseline agreement with the key was 87.2% across 15,683 analyzable conversations. The incorrect option was adopted more often from the specialist described as 2/10 than from the student described as 8/10 (10.2% vs. 7.6%; adjusted risk difference +2.82 percentage points, 95% CI +0.65 to +4.99). Estimates varied across the three systems and only one system-specific interval excluded zero. In a prespecified exploratory analysis with a shared eligibility rule, correct suggestions were adopted far more often than incorrect ones (risk difference +35.7 percentage points, 95% CI +30.8 to +40.7), indicating selective rather than indiscriminate compliance. An incorrect suggestion from a specialist with low stated accuracy was therefore slightly more influential than the same suggestion from a student with high stated accuracy, although the difference was modest and varied across systems. Agreement reached only after a user has disclosed a preferred answer should not automatically be treated as an independent second opinion, and medical large language model systems should be evaluated on how they revise answers after such disclosure, not solely on initial accuracy.

Conventional sleep electroencephalography (EEG) measures often rely on predefined bands, thresholds, and averages that incompletely capture transient oscillatory dynamics across an entire night. Here, we introduce the Dynamic Oscillation (DYNAM-O) Toolbox, an open-source, cross-platform (MATLAB, Python, and Rust) software package for data-driven characterization of individualized neural dynamics in sleep EEG. DYNAM-O identifies transient oscillations as time-frequency peaks on multitaper spectrograms using a novel multi-resolution procedure, computes intrinsic and sleep-state-dependent extrinsic features for each event, and represents the overnight distributions of tens of thousands of TF-peaks as feature histograms spanning oscillation frequency, slow oscillation power, and slow oscillation phase. This distributional representation preserves continuous brain-state variation that could be obscured by averaging within conventional sleep stages. The toolbox further provides Gaussian and spline basis-based dimensionality reduction, visualization, and whole-histogram statistical testing tools to support both exploratory and hypothesis-driven analyses. To demonstrate its use for group-level inference, we analyzed overnight C3-channel EEG from 133 adults (71 females, 72 males; ages 20-35 years) in the Cleveland Family Study. Whole-histogram and parameterized-mode analyses reproduced the established higher center frequency of fast-spindle activity in females and additionally revealed greater low-alpha transient oscillatory activity in females, a pattern outside the conventional sleep spindle range. By completing the analysis cycle from TF-peak extraction to statistical inference, DYNAM-O provides an accessible and interpretable framework for studying individualized sleep physiology and identifying subtle, reproducible electrophysiological patterns.

Objectives This study aimed to assess sleep patterns and life satisfaction among employees of a private company in Dubai, United Arab Emirates, and to examine the relationships among sleep quality, life satisfaction, and selected demographic variables. A quantitative descriptive cross-sectional survey design was adopted. Methods A convenience sample of 110 male employees participated in the study. Data were collected using the Sleep Disorder Assessment Scale (16 items; Cronbachs = 0.89) and the Life Satisfaction Scale (5 items). Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 29, including descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, and Pearson correlation analysis. Results Most participants (66.4%) were aged 20-30 years, and 82.7% experienced moderate sleep-related problems. Mobile phone use before bedtime was common, with 60.9% reporting occasional use and 35.5% reporting regular use. Overall, 41.8% reported neutral life satisfaction, while 25.5% and 24.6% were slightly and extremely satisfied, respectively. A significant negative correlation was found between poor sleep patterns and life satisfaction (r = -0.389, p < 0.001). Mobile phone use before bedtime and shift work were significantly associated with sleep patterns (p = 0.048). Conclusion Poor sleep quality, particularly among shift workers and frequent bedtime mobile phone users, is associated with lower life satisfaction. Workplace interventions promoting sleep hygiene may enhance employee well-being.

Background Computerised cognitive testing may address the global challenge in identifying cognitive changes in people living with HIV scalably and affordably. We assessed a computerised battery (CB) of cognitive tests, in a prospective cohort (CONNECT) of people with HIV in a low-income peri-urban area of Cape Town, South Africa during a national programmatic switch from efavirenz- to dolutegravir-based antiretroviral therapy (ART). Methods We recruited 170 people with HIV and 91 people without HIV (controls) (140[82%] and 41[45%] followed up). The CB and gold-standard pen&paper cognitive testing (P&P) were performed at both timepoints. Technology familiarity/use questionnaire data were also collected. We compared performance in detecting lower group-level cognitive performance associated with efavirenz treatment. Furthermore, the CB was compared to P&P in classifying individuals with low cognitive performance, correlation of global test scores and domain-level scores between batteries, and practice effects between timepoints. Exploratory principal component analysis was also performed. Results People with HIV on efavirenz at baseline had lower performance on the computerised battery than controls, {Delta}T=2.6, p=0.0047. This difference was lost after switching to dolutegravir-based ART at follow-up. CB and P&P global T were moderately correlated (R2=0.203, p<0.001), and the CB performed moderately in classification of low cognitive performance against the gold standard (AUC 0.70, sensitivity 0.52, specificity 0.76, PPV 0.40, and NPV 0.84). Selecting the first three principal components improved both classification of low cognitive performance (AUC 0.77) and correlation strength with P&P global T (R2=0.3, p<0.001). The CB did not show practice effects. Most participants owned a mobile phone (95%, 85.9% of these smartphones). Performance was better in smartphone owners ({Delta}T=1.8) and computer owners (23%, {Delta}T=1.8). Conclusions Delivering computerised cognitive testing was feasible in this low-income southern African setting. The CB showed reasonable construct validity (detecting known lower cognitive performance associated with efavirenz-ART) and may detect broad cognitive characteristics such as processing speed and accuracy. However, correlation of CB results with gold standard P&P testing was low-moderate and may limit its applicability as a diagnostic tool. This might be improved by including a wider range of cognitive domains tested in the CB, or data driven analysis. Brief CBs may fulfil an initial screening role, followed by more detailed clinical assessment.

BACKGROUND Generative AI (genAI) chart summarization tools embedded in electronic health records (EHRs) are being rapidly deployed across U.S. health systems. Although these tools represent a promising solution to alleviate cognitive burdens, their effects have not been examined in randomized-clinical trials (RCTs). METHODS In this pragmatic RCT at a single academic health system, 284 outpatient clinicians across forty-two specialties were assigned 1:1 to Epic's outpatient chart summarization tool or a usual-care control arm over 90 days, from February 23 to May 23, 2026. The primary outcome was physician task load (PTL) adapted for pre-charting. Prespecified exploratory outcomes included additional validated psychometrics as well as usability, safety, and time-based measures. Descriptive statistics included interaction and usage of the tool. RESULTS Of 74,474 AI chart summaries generated, 14.2% were interacted with by a clinician; the proportion of generated summaries interacted with declined from 21.5% in month 1 to 10.5% in month 3, and the proportion of clinicians using the tool at least once per month declined from 88.7% to 66.2%. The adjusted between-arm difference in PTL at follow-up favored the intervention arm (scale 0-400; -27.4; 95% CI, -49.4 to -5.3; P=0.02). Among the Professional Fulfillment Index (PFI; scale 0-4, lower=better) psychometrics, overall burnout (-0.20; 95% CI, -0.38 to -0.01) and work exhaustion (-0.24; 95% CI, -0.47 to -0.02) were lower in the intervention arm, with little difference in overall professional fulfillment (+0.04; 95% CI, -0.16 to 0.25). Charting time per encounter showed no significant between-arm difference during steady state (-1.2 seconds; 95% CI, -19.0 to 16.6). The net promoter score was -22, indicating that on average, clinicians did not recommend the tool. Among free-text respondents, 57.1% reported at least one concern, most commonly tool limitations or inaccurate information. No adverse patient safety events or near-misses were reported. CONCLUSION An EHR-integrated AI chart summarization tool modestly reduced physician task load and was associated with lower burnout, without time savings and against declining engagement. Sustained usage and oversight of reported inaccuracies remain open challenges.

Background: Endometriosis is a chronic pain condition in which hormonal therapies form the cornerstone of long-term management. Treatment tolerability is critical for adherence and therapeutic success, but most comparative studies and reviews have focused on their ability to reduce menstrual pain, while their impact on non-menstrual pelvic pain (NMPP), bleeding patterns, adverse events (AEs), treatment discontinuation and quality of life (QoL) remain poorly characterised. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluate these outcomes across currently available hormonal therapies, providing practical evidence for clinical decision-making. Methods: PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Embase were searched up to November 2025 for randomised controlled trials comparing at least two active first- or second-line hormonal treatments for endometriosis. Studies without confirmed endometriosis, treatment duration less than three months and comparing therapies to placebo only were excluded. Data were extracted by two reviewers from reports. Pain outcomes were pooled as mean differences (MD, 95% CI), with bleeding patterns, AEs, and discontinuations as proportions. Analyses were performed in R. PROSPERO: CRD420251137785. Findings: Of 1892 records screened, 48 trials (5583 women) met our inclusion criteria. Overall pelvic pain (0-10 scale) was significantly reduced across all treatment categories (p<0.001): combined oral contraceptives (COCs) (MD 3.17), oral and long-acting progestogens (MD 3.83; MD 4.29), and GnRH-analogues (MD 3.81). Sensitivity analyses restricted to studies reporting NMPP yielded comparable results. GnRH-agonists showed the most favourable bleeding profile, followed by continuous COCs. However, all regimens reported class-specific AEs, including mood changes, nausea, headache, weight gain, and decreased libido (pooled proportions >10%). Overall discontinuation due to AEs was 7.7%, and vaginal bleeding was the leading cause. Heterogeneity across meta-analyses was high. Risk of bias (RoB2) was moderate to high. Interpretation: Given similar reductions in overall pelvic pain across hormonal therapies, treatment decisions should prioritise differences in bleeding profiles, therapy-specific AEs, and QoL. Funding: None.

Cerebral hemodynamics are difficult to monitor continuously outside the laboratory. Optical head-worn wearables have been proposed for tracking cerebral blood-flow signals, but they require comparison with an established cerebrovascular reference before they can be interpreted. We evaluated a temple-worn optical wearable, Temple, that outputs a proprietary, dimensionless Brain Flow index, intended as a proxy for relative changes in cerebral hemodynamics, against transcranial Doppler (TCD) ultrasound, which measures blood-flow velocity in the middle cerebral artery (MCAv). Twenty-three healthy adults completed two physiological challenges that elicit distinct and acute cerebral hemodynamic responses: a cycle-ergometer exercise protocol and a stand-to-supine postural transition protocol. Twenty participants were analyzed per protocol. The Brain Flow index tracked MCAv in both protocols, with significant within-subject temporal correlations (median Pearson r = 0.795 and 0.799 for exercise and postural transition; p < 0.001) and directionally concordant, statistically significant transition responses for both increases and decreases in flow. Bland-Altman analysis of the normalized transition responses showed small mean biases between the two devices, consistent with similar relative response shapes. Because both signals were standardized within session before this comparison, it addresses the shape of the relative change rather than agreement in absolute units. The Brain Flow index reproduced the direction and time course of MCAv under both perturbations, including the postural transition, where heart rate moved in the opposite direction. Further studies using complementary modalities and additional cerebrovascular reactivity challenges are required to establish clinical use cases and cerebral specificity of the Brain Flow index.

Background: People affected by cancer often face difficulty finding relevant clinical, psychological, and practical support services. AI-powered navigation assistants may improve access to these resources, but their retrieval performance must be reliable. Objective: To develop a single-pass retrieval-augmented generation assistant for cancer-care navigation and compare the retrieval strategies, including their robustness to reworded questions. Methods: We created a database of 853 cancer-support resources reviewed by librarians, clinicians, researchers, and patient partners. We evaluated the system using 100 questions derived from questions submitted by patients. We compared keyword-based, semantic, and hybrid retrieval using Precision@K, Hit@K, and nDCG@K. The best-performing configuration was then tested using semantically equivalent rewordings of the original questions. Results: Keyword-based retrieval performed poorly, achieving a P@1 of 25.0% and Hit@5 of 43.0%. Semantic retrieval improved these results to 58.0% and 86.0%, respectively. The best hybrid configuration achieved a P@1 of 64.0%, Hit@5 of 90.0%, and nDCG@5 of 51.0%. Performance remained relatively stable when the questions were reworded, with a P@1 of 61.0%, Hit@5 of 88.0%, and nDCG@5 of 46.1%. Conclusions: Hybrid retrieval performed best and remained relatively stable when questions were reworded. However, its limited ability to rank a relevant resource first highlights the limitations of single-pass retrieval for patient-facing cancer navigation. Future work will explore metadata filtering and a multi-agent architecture to improve retrieval reliability.

The openEHR standard provides an open, vendor-neutral architecture for clinical data repositories (CDRs), yet its real-world deployment has not been systematically documented. We conducted a dual-perspective survey combining a vendor survey of openEHR CDR providers with a community survey of openEHR practitioners. Eleven vendor organisations reported deployments across 22 countries and over 100 institutions and health regions. A complementary community survey (n=29, 17 countries) provided context on regulatory environments, adoption drivers, and barriers. Combined, the surveys cover 28 countries, 26 of them with a reported openEHR CDR deployment. Three findings emerge: openEHR has achieved national-scale presence through two distinct channels. Through vendor-market convergence, openEHR-based systems cover the majority of regional health authorities without a national mandate, including 19 of 21 Swedish regions, 3 of 4 Norwegian health regions, and 16 of 21 Finnish wellbeing services counties. Through national health record adoption, governments have built or procured national systems on openEHR as their technical foundation, including Ireland, Malta, Greece, Jamaica and Slovenia. Across Europe, this constitutes an openEHR-based interoperability infrastructure already in place across multiple EU member states. We identified no country in which openEHR is named in binding national regulation, creating structural fragility and an unrealised opportunity for alignment with the European Health Data Space (EHDS). Second, 61% of deployments serve primary use only, and 12% support both primary and secondary use. Third, lack of openEHR-specific knowledge is the most consistent adoption barrier across all geographies and deployment tiers. Adoption is driven by practitioner need and innovation, not by regulatory mandate.